Gallery Dept Hats have become one of the most popular accessories in the fashion industry, with many celebrities sporting them on various occasions. These hats have a unique distressed look that has made them a fast-favorite among fashion enthusiasts. However, there has been controversy surrounding these hats regarding their ownership. Some people allege that Gallery Dept Hats have been stolen designs from smaller brands. In this article, we will dive into this controversy and see who really owns
Gallery Dept Hats.
is a Los Angeles-based fashion brand started by designer Josue Thomas. The brand is known for its hand-distressed clothing and accessories, specifically the Gallery Dept Hat. While these hats are gaining popularity in the fashion industry, there are allegations that the hats have been stolen designs from smaller brands.
One of the allegations
was made by Martine Rose, a London-based brand and designer who accused Gallery Dept of copying her designs. In an interview, Martine stated that Gallery Dept copied her Graffiti Shirt and claimed ownership simply because they’re based in the United States. In response, Josue Thomas defended himself saying that he had never heard of the brand before nor had he ever seen the shirt. He also added that he wanted to reach out to Martine to resolve the issue.The allegations didn’t stop there. Another designer, Park Hye-Min, who goes by the name of Pony, accused Gallery Dept through her Instagram page of copying several of her designs. In her post, she compared her designs side by side with those of Gallery Dept and claimed that her designs had been directly plagiarized. She also added that her team had made several attempts to reach out to the brand, but they didn’t receive any response.
On the other hand
,some people have stood up for Gallery Dept, stating that the designs are heavily inspired by the hip-hop scene and that nothing is entirely original anymore. These supporters also claim that the brand has a unique vision and style that sets them apart from other fashion brands.
Despite this controversy
Gallery Dept Hats have continued to sell well, with many people still clamoring for the one-of-a-kind hats. The debate over the ownership of these hats is still ongoing. While Josue Thomas and Gallery Dept have denied plagiarizing designs, the smaller brands continue to hold on to their stance that their designs were stolen.
Conclusion:
The Gallery Dept Hat controversy may never see a resolution. The fashion industry is built on inspiration and creativity, but there always seems to be an unwritten line that designers should not cross when it comes to copying designs. The accusations made by Martine Rose and Pony have undoubtedly tarnished the image and reputation of Gallery Dept. But at the same time, the support from many people in the fashion industry indicates something unique about these Hats. Regardless of who the original creator of these designs is, the Gallery dept hats are undoubtedly here to stay. The takeaway from this controversy should be that as a society, we should recognize and applaud original creators and designers instead of those who might have copied them.